Why
does it matter what we do with our forested piece of property? What difference can my little spot of ground make in the scheme
of the forest as a whole?
Answer from jk:
Every
acre of forest that is managed in an ecological manner can provide many benefits such as additional oxygen production and
homes for wild creatures. We must never have a defeatist attitude and need to understand that we are a part of a greater whole,
albeit a tiny part. We are all serving the purpose of nurturing and protecting this Earth for future generations of humans.
Comment from Larry B.:
Global
warming is a crock. I can't believe that you are buying into it.
Comment from RR:
What
the hell do you people know! Leave forest management to people who have been in the business and know how to do it. We have
done pretty good for along time before you started this crap.
Comment from justdoit @ Indymedia:
I and some friends (32 total) have formed a readers/polling group where once a week each person picks an article for
everyone to read- yes, that is 32 articles. Everyone in the group reads and is polled about each article. Your article titled
"Forest Farming- The Ecological Approach to Forest Management" is one of them. Here are the results of our
poll:
30 liked the article and two did not. The two thought that the article was just more timber industry propaganda
and did not believe a word of it. Of the 30 who liked it, 28 believed that this was written by a person who has a sincere
committment to forest health and rehabilitation of the ecosystems that were previously harmed by logging. The remaining 4
who liked the article indicated that they wanted to believe that the writer was sincere in commitment to the earth, but that
it was hard to believe that there was such a change in forest management techniques.
Comment from Buzn @ IMC:
When I read the article about forest farming on the Portland Independent Media Center website, I envisioned a tree plantation
with neat rows of trees, but I went to your website and what I saw was totally different- beautiful natural forest, wildlife
and lots of native plants!
Now I get it! Farming is growing things, and what you grow is not just trees-it is an
entire forest! very cool. I like it.
Comment from "wish I were a tree on KFF" @ Indymedia:
I am amazed at this idea. I never considered that anyone interested in forestry, thought of anything but cutting trees.
I am so glad that there are people who care about the forest in terms of ecosystems and the future of the Earth. Some of the
photos on the website are incredible. I have ordered the "Alex's Forest Farm" book and cannot wait to receive it. Kudos Kendrick Forest Farm!!! Keep up the good work. Our future depends upon people like you.
Comment from Donna H @ IMC:
Although this was an interesting article, you are not the first forest farmers. There was an organization in so. oregon many years ago who were active in managing their forest land according
to forest farm management principles. Orville camp headed the organization and wrote a book called "natural selection forestry"
which talked about this type of management. I thought that they had all beome extinct, but maybe not.
Answer to Donna H. from jak:
Donna
you are absolutely correct!. We were one of those very early eco-forestry pioneers and have been involved in the forest farm
management movement from the time we met Orville Camp and read his book. It helped us to galvanize our thoughts and determination
to manage our forest the way that we felt was right-not according to industry standards. There are not a lot of us around,
but we are not "extinct"...more like Bigfoot- only visible if you really look hard in remote and quiet forests.
Comment from Slicker @ IMC:
The
general gist of the company *advertised* above is commendable, but the arrogant tone belies the managerial code embedded in
its protestant outlook. Take for example the statement, "forest tree stands need to be thinned," a frequently bandied expression.
Well, according to who and what circumstances does a forest "need" to be thinned? One would easily agree that the monocropped
plantations that cover the state could stand to be "trimmed," but the concept that forests inherently need human management
is absurd. I cannot even bring myself to look at the disgusting website showing the cutover forest of stumps.
Answer from jak:
You
can't please people all of the time and we do not even try. Our focus is our forest. We try to do our best for our forest
- not to gain approval from people...especially those who already have their miinds made up and do not even want to look
and be certain that their words apply. (!!?)
Comment from "roadside viewer" @ Rogue Media:
I
have looked out my car window as I whizzed down I-5 many times, but not once did I ever think about WHO renovates all those
logged over lands that I grimace as I look at.
I
think that this must be a tremendous undertaking and I salute someone with the interest and wherewithal to do so.
Comment from Biologeez:
I
found this article interesting-if it is true. Far too many forest managers feed us a lot of BS, when their true intent is
just to find an excuse to cut trees. I looked at the website associated with the article and liked what I saw. I have only
one question...how is an operation such as this supported? I can't imagine that they would spend their earnings (it does indicate
that they work outside the forest farm operation) just to grow trees. But wouldn't it be nice if it were true.
Answer from jk:
Alas,
'tis true...we work just to be able to support our forest.
Comment from Donald J.:
When I first read your forum article called Cut it,watch it or do not touch it, I thought that it was stupid. But my
wife just weren't getting along and did not seem to understand what the other said, so we tried it. You saved our marriage.
Answer from jk:
Sometimes the simplest things are the best. Glad we could help.
Comment from angie B.:
I read your forum article "Ecosystem Services- Making the Link" and find the concept very interesting.
I wonder if there are entities who are trying to create a marketplace for these services. I also wonder if this is going
to end up being just another scam by the forest industry? If it can be kept out of their hands perhaps it will be something
that people will feel safe to invest in.
Answer from jk:
Angie, I understand your concern over this becoming just another industry scam and hope that it can develop
into a program that will be functional for landowners like us and rewarding to those folks who want to invest. At present
there are only a couple of programs that I am aware of. We belong to an organization called the Oregon Small Woodlands
Association who is interested in this concept. They are working on developing a "carbon aggregator" market for family woodland
owners in conjunction with the American Forest Foundation. Also, the Willamette Partnership is working on creating a
market for temperature credits.
Comment from runsilent at RogueIMC:
The conclusions reached in the article "Ecosystem Services- Making the Link" appear to be valid. The concept is intriguing
and if it can be implemented could certainly provide a solution to what we are all concerned about- saving our forested ecosystems.